Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2N Telekomunikace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:38, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

2N Telekomunikace

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

2N Telekomunikace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is almost entirely a commercial web page. Almost all the references arefrom their own site. DGG ( talk ) 00:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:06, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:06, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

• Delete I agree the article reads like a publicity statement, suitable for their own website but not Wikipedia. Most of it is incidentally sourced to their own web site(s), and I could only identify these two sources as potentially acceptable: Businesswire on acquisition Czech site on acquisition – interestingly, the article does not mention the main point of these news, that the company changed ownership in 2017. 2N is also mentioned in passing here, but I don't think that counts as significant coverage. With the article in a bad shape and the company imo failing WP:CORP, I vote delete. --LordPeterII (talk) 10:04, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per LordPeterII. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 10:18, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.